FE’LLARNING GRAMMATIKALASHUVI BOSQICHLARI BORASIDAGI TURLI QARASHLAR
Keywords:
Grammatikalashuv, grammatikalashuvoldi, kognitiv lingvistika, feʼl, semantik siyqalashuv, grammatikalashuv zanjiri, koʻmakchi feʼllar.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada feʼllarning grammatikalashuv jarayonida bosib oʻtadigan taraqqiyot yoʻli haqidagi fikr-mulohazalar solishtiriladi. Unda asosan T.Kuteva, G.Anderson va C.Bowern kabi olimlarning nazariyalariga tayangan holda, grammatikalashuvning uzlukli, bir chiziqli jarayon emasligini, balki diaxronik va sinxronik jihatdan murakkab hodisa ekanligiga urgʻu beriladi.References
1. Anderson, G. D. S. (2005). Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press
2. Bowern, C. (2008). The diachrony of complex predicates. In C. Bowern & L. Evans (Eds.), The Diachrony of Complex Predicates (pp. 161–185). Oxford University Press.
3. Erdal, M. (2004). A Grammar of Old Turkic. Brill.
4. Gyorfi, D. (2022) Auxiliary verb constructions in Modern Spoken Kazakh. Surrey: University of Surrey.
5. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005). Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge University Press.
6. Kuteva, T. (2001). Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
7. McKenzie, A., Eziz, G., & Major, T. (2018). Latent homomorphism and content satisfaction: The double life of Turkic auxiliary –(İ)p bol–. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.422
8. Simeonidis, V., & Lavidas, N. (2023). Linguistic complexity and theories of language in diachrony. In N. Lavidas & M.-A. M. Gendron (Eds.), Simplicité et complexité des langues dans l'histoire des théories linguistiques (pp. 451–478). Société d’Histoire et d’Épistémologie des Sciences du Langage.
9. Хожиев А. Ўзбек тилида кўмакчи феъллар. — Тошкент: Фан, 1966. — 227 б.