The Role of Feedback in Improving Students’ Writing Competence
Keywords:
feedback, writing competence, corrective feedback, formative feedback, peer feedback, student autonomy, writing improvement.Abstract
This article examines the critical role of feedback in developing students’ writing competence. Writing is a multifaceted skill requiring grammatical knowledge, lexical range, and the ability to organize ideas coherently. Feedback, whether from teachers or peers, provides learners with targeted guidance, identifies errors, and motivates revision. Based on my observations as an educator, students who receive structured and constructive feedback demonstrate significant improvement in sentence variety, coherence, and clarity of argumentation. The article discusses corrective, formative, and peer feedback and highlights effective strategies for integrating feedback into writing instruction. Findings indicate that systematic feedback enhances learners’ autonomy, confidence, and critical thinking skills, ultimately improving overall writing performance.
References
1. Ferris, D. (2018). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. University of Michigan Press.
2. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
3. Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27.
4. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press.
5. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
6. NATIONAL CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRASEMES WITH FOOD/FOOD IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. (2023). American Journal of Pedagogical and Educational Research, 19, 116-119.https://americanjournal.org/index.php/ajper/article/view/1606
7. Eshquvvatova Gulasal Abdullo qizi. (2024). ETYMOLOGY OF SOME IDIOMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Лучшие интеллектуальные исследования, 16(1), 40–45. Retrieved from https://web-journal.ru/journal/article/view/3375
8. Eshquvvatova , G. . (2023). CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS RELATED TO FOOD NAMES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Journal of Agriculture & Horticulture, 3(10), 89–94. Retrieved from https://internationalbulletins.com/intjour/index.php/jah/article/view/1134
9. Kizi, Eshquvvatova G. A. "National Cultural Characteristics of Phrasemes with Food/food in English and Uzbek Languages." American Journal of Pedagogical and Educational Research, vol. 19, 11 Dec. 2023, pp. 116-119.
10. EFFECTIVE METHODS OF ORGANIZING ENGLISH LANGUAGE LESSONS FOR OPTIMAL LEARNING OUTCOMES. (2024). American Journal of Pedagogical and Educational Research, 31, 29-31. https://americanjournal.org/index.php/ajper/article/view/2539